top of page

Navigating the Fine Line of Work Assignments During the Interview Process

Updated: Apr 16

In today's competitive job market, showcasing your skill sets is crucial in securing employment opportunities. Many job seekers find themselves not only demonstrating their skills in multiple interviews, showing previous work samples, requiring various skill tests but also by being asked by hiring managers to create new work or projects by prospective employers as part of the process. Potential job candidates grapple with the question of how much work is acceptable to demonstrate their capabilities before it becomes a form of unpaid labor. Striking the right balance is essential to protect your time and expertise while still making a positive impression during the interview process.

The Importance of Demonstrating Skills

Employers often seek tangible evidence of a candidate's abilities before making hiring decisions. Demonstrating your skills during an interview can set you apart from other candidates and provide employers with a clearer understanding of your capabilities. However, this process should be collaborative and respectful of both the candidate's time and the employer's expectations.

Understanding the Thin Line

While it's important to showcase your skills, it's equally crucial to recognize when a request for work samples or a demonstration project crosses into the territory of free labor. Here are some factors to consider:

Scope of the Assignment:

  • Acceptable: A small, task-oriented project directly related to the role can be reasonable.

  • Borderline: Extensive projects or assignments that mimic actual job responsibilities may raise concerns.

  • Unacceptable: Any assignment that requires a significant time investment and goes beyond the scope of the interview process.

Time Commitment:

  • Acceptable: A few hours or a brief task that can be completed within a reasonable time frame.

  • Borderline: Requests for days of work, especially if it's unpaid and resource-intensive.

  • Unacceptable: Any demand that significantly interferes with your current job, personal life, or involves an unreasonable time commitment

Transparent Communication:

  • Acceptable: Clear communication about the purpose, expected time commitment, and the use of the work.

  • Borderline: Lack of transparency about the purpose of the assignment or how the work will be utilized.

  • Unacceptable: Requests that lack clarity and transparency, leaving the candidate uncertain about the purpose or outcome.

Protecting Yourself

To avoid falling into the trap of providing free labor, consider these proactive steps:

1. Clarify Expectations: Before undertaking any task, ensure you have a clear understanding of the purpose, scope, and time commitment involved.

2. Set Boundaries: Establish limits on the time and effort you are willing to invest in pre-interview assignments, and communicate these boundaries to the employer.

3. Negotiate: If an assignment seems extensive, discuss with the employer whether there are alternative ways to demonstrate your skills or if a shorter version of the task would suffice.

4. Portfolio Presentation: Offer a portfolio of previous work, projects, or achievements to showcase your skills without the need for additional unpaid assignments.


In the dynamic realm of job interviews and skill displays, candidates must vigilantly protect their time and expertise, navigating the fine line between collaborative demonstrations and inadvertently entering the realm of unpaid labor. Unpaid assignments, driven by the intense pressure to secure employment, often lead to an emotional conflict between the desire for a job and the reluctance to engage in free labor. This internal struggle adds complexity to the job-seeking journey, prompting questions about ethics and equity in the hiring process. As employers increasingly demand bespoke projects, the need for industry-wide discussions on the ethicality of such practices becomes urgent. Advocating for transparency and fairness, it's crucial to collectively address the emotional toll of this delicate balance, fostering a hiring culture that values candidates without imposing unreasonable burdens. Initiating dialogues around these challenges and promoting fair practices can shape a job-seeking landscape that is both skill-centric and empathetic, respecting the individuals propelling it forward.

269 views0 comments


bottom of page